Thứ Ba, 25 tháng 10, 2016
From Somebody's Diary
SEMYON ARDALYONOVITCH said to me all of a sudden the day
before yesterday: "Why, will you ever be sober, Ivan Ivano-
vitch? Tell me that, pray."
A strange requirement. I did not resent it, I am a timid man;
but here they have actually made me out mad. An artist
painted my portrait as it happened: "After all, you are a
literary man," he said. I submitted, he exhibited it. I read:
"Go and look at that morbid face suggesting insanity."
It may be so, but think of putting it so bluntly into print. In
print everything ought to be decorous; there ought to be ideals,
while instead of that . . .
Say it indirectly, at least; that's what you have style for. But
no, he doesn't care to do it indirectly. Nowadays humour and
a fine style have disappeared, and abuse is accepted as wit. I
do not resent it: but God knows I am not enough of a literary
man to go out of my mind. I have written a novel, it has not
been published. I have written articles - they have been
refused. Those articles I took about from one editor to
another; everywhere they refused them: you have no salt they
told me. "What sort of salt do you want?" I asked with a
eer. "Attic salt?"
They did not even understand, For the most part I translate
from the French for the booksellers. I write advertisements for
shopkeepers too: "Unique opportunity! Fine tea, from our
own plantations . . ." I made a nice little sum over a panegyric
on his deceased excellency Pyotr Matveyitch. I compiled the
"Art of pleasing the ladies", a commission from a bookseller.
I have brought out some six little works of this kind in the
course of my life. I am thinking of making a collection of the
bons mobs of Voltaire, but am afraid it may seem a little flat to
our people. Voltaire's no good now; nowadays we want a
cudgel, not Voltaire. We knock each other's last teeth out
nowadays. Well, so that's the whole extent of my literary
activity. Though indeed I do send round letters to the editors
gratis and fully signed. I give them all sorts of counsels and
admonitions, criticise and point out the true path. The letter I
sent last week to an editor's office was the fortieth I had sent
in the last two years. I have wasted four roubles over stamps
alone for them. My temper is at the bottom of it all.
I believe that the artist who painted me did so not for the sake
of literature, but for the sake of two symmetrical warts on my
forehead, a natural phenomenon, he would say. They have no
ideas, so now they are out for phenomena. And didn't he
succeed in getting my warts in his portrait - to the life. That
is what they call realism.
And as to madness, a great many people were put down as
mad among us last year. And in such language! "With such
original talent ....... and yet, after all, it appears" . . . "how-
ever, one ought to have foreseen it long ago." That is rather
artful; so that from the point of view of pure art one may
really commend it. Well, but after all, these so-called madmen
have turned out cleverer than ever. So it seems the critics can
call them mad, but they cannot produce anyone better.
The wisest of all, in my opinion, is he who can, if only once a
month, call himself a fool - a faculty unheard of nowadays.
In old days, once a year at any rate a fool would recognise that
he was a fool, but nowadays not a bit of it. And they have so
muddled things up that there is no telling a fool from a wise
man. They have done that on purpose.
I remember a witty Spaniard saying when, two hundred and
fifty years ago, the French built their first madhouses: "They
have shut up all their fools in a house apart, to make sure that
they are wise men themselves." Just so: you don't show your
own wisdom by shutting someone else in a madhouse. "K. has
gone out of his mind, means that we are sane now." No, it
doesn't mean that yet.
Hang it though, why am I maundering on? I go on grumbling
and grumbling. Even my maidservant is sick of me. Yester-
day a friend came to see me. "Your style is changing," he said;
"it is choppy: you chop and chop - and then a parenthesis,
then a parenthesis in the parenthesis, then you stick in some-
thing else in brackets, then you begin chopping and chopping
again."
The friend is right. Something strange is happening to me.
My character is changing and my head aches. I am beginning
to see and hear strange things, not voices exactly, but as though
someone beside me were muttering, "bobok, bobok, bobok!"
What's the meaning of this bobok? I must divert my mind.
Đăng ký:
Đăng Nhận xét (Atom)
Không có nhận xét nào:
Đăng nhận xét